TY - JOUR
T1 - 2017 Measuring Rights-Based Perspectives A Validation of the Human Rights Lens in Social Work Scale.pdf
T2 - A validation of the human rights lens in social work scale
AU - Siebert, Carl
AU - McPherson, Jane
AU - Siebert, Darcy Clay
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by the Society for Social Work and Research. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/6/1
Y1 - 2017/6/1
N2 - Objective: This article reports the initial validation of the Human Rights Lens in Social Work (HRLSW) scale, a tool designed to measure a social work-er’s ability to see individual and social problems as resulting from human rights violations. The purpose of the research was to gather evidence regarding the validity of this multidimensional measure of a new construct, i.e., human rights lens. Method: Data from a convenience sample of 1,014 licensed clinical social workers were collected by electronic survey, and the sample was split to conduct discrete exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The exploratory factor analysis was performed on half of the sample (n = 507) to establish the underlying factor structure of the construct; the other half of the sample (n = 507) underwent a confirmatory factor analysis to examine the subsample’s psychometric properties. Results: A respecified model using only one error covariance fit the data very well. All fit indices were within their critical values (x2/df ratio = 1.5; CFI =.99; TLI =.99; RMSEA =.03; SRMR =.03). Thus, factor analysis confirms a two-factor, 11-item model for the HRLSW scale, consisting of two subscales, clients seen as experiencing rights violations, and social problems seen as rights violations. Conclusions: This scale is a useful tool for educators, researchers, and practitioners who want to practice—or promote the practice of—social work as a human rights profession.
AB - Objective: This article reports the initial validation of the Human Rights Lens in Social Work (HRLSW) scale, a tool designed to measure a social work-er’s ability to see individual and social problems as resulting from human rights violations. The purpose of the research was to gather evidence regarding the validity of this multidimensional measure of a new construct, i.e., human rights lens. Method: Data from a convenience sample of 1,014 licensed clinical social workers were collected by electronic survey, and the sample was split to conduct discrete exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The exploratory factor analysis was performed on half of the sample (n = 507) to establish the underlying factor structure of the construct; the other half of the sample (n = 507) underwent a confirmatory factor analysis to examine the subsample’s psychometric properties. Results: A respecified model using only one error covariance fit the data very well. All fit indices were within their critical values (x2/df ratio = 1.5; CFI =.99; TLI =.99; RMSEA =.03; SRMR =.03). Thus, factor analysis confirms a two-factor, 11-item model for the HRLSW scale, consisting of two subscales, clients seen as experiencing rights violations, and social problems seen as rights violations. Conclusions: This scale is a useful tool for educators, researchers, and practitioners who want to practice—or promote the practice of—social work as a human rights profession.
KW - Human rights
KW - Human rights practice
KW - Social work
KW - Social workers
KW - Validation studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044089957&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/692017
DO - 10.1086/692017
M3 - Article
VL - 25
SP - 233
EP - 257
JO - Journal for the Society for Social Work and Research
JF - Journal for the Society for Social Work and Research
IS - 1
ER -