A comparison of jail inmate and staff correctional goal orientations: Results from across the line

Peter A. Collins, Brian Iannacchione, Marianne Hudson, Mary K. Stohr, Craig Hemmens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Previous research on correctional goal orientations has focused on the attitudes of the public, correctional administrators, and correctional staff. Only a few studies have examined inmate attitudes. This research addresses the question: Do jail inmates and staff have similar beliefs about the goals of corrections? Findings from a sample drawn from a single rural mountain state jail indicate that jail staff rank incapacitation as the primary goal of corrections, while inmates rank rehabilitation as most important. Results from two multinomial logistic regression models were mixed. The inmate model indicated that race is significantly associated with a rehabilitative goal orientation. Additionally, for inmates, gender and education influence a non-retributive goal orientation. The staff model did not reach statistical significance. These findings lend some support to further empirical studies that address problems associated with correctional operations and organizational culture in a way that incorporates an inmate perspective.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)100-115
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Crime and Justice
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2013

Keywords

  • goal orientation
  • incapacitation
  • jail
  • rehabilitation
  • retribution

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of jail inmate and staff correctional goal orientations: Results from across the line'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this