Abstract
In this study, we utilize a unique quarterly dataset of non-GAAP earnings to re-examine the “informational” role of non-GAAP earnings from the perspective of value relevance and earnings predictability in the post-Reg G period. We find that non-GAAP earnings are more value relevant and can better predict future operating earnings of a firm compared to equivalent GAAP earnings. Additionally, we also find empirical evidence suggesting that the difference in the value relevance and earnings predictability between non-GAAP and equivalent GAAP earnings can vary across but cannot be completely mitigated by firm-level characteristics, such as the market value of equity, accruals quality, analyst coverage, and managerial ability of a firm. Moreover, our supplementary analysis reveals that the superior value relevance and predictive power of non-GAAP earnings persist even after the SEC’s release of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DI) in 2010. Overall, our empirical evidence suggests a superior “informational” role of non-GAAP earnings to equivalent GAAP earnings in terms of valuation and predictability on future operating performance in the post-Reg G period.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 414 |
| Journal | Journal of Risk and Financial Management |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2025 |
Keywords
- earnings informativeness
- earnings predictability
- non-GAAP earnings
- value relevance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A Re-Examination of the “Informational” Role of Non-GAAP Earnings in the Post-Reg G Period'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver