A Strategy Map’s Effect on the Feedback That Middle Managers Pass Along to Upper Management

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Feedback from lower-level employees helps upper management know when a strategy revision is necessary. Middle managers have significant control over upper management’s access to lower-level employee feedback because they decide whether to pass along that feedback when they receive it. A strategy map may help mitigate bias in these middle managers’ feedback reporting decisions. In my experiment, participants act as middle managers who receive one of two types of lower-level employee feedback: positive feedback or negative feedback. Without a strategy map, participants over-report positive feedback, under-report negative feedback, and exhibit motivated reasoning toward negative feedback. With a strategy map, participants over-report positive feedback less, under-report negative feedback at the same rate, and their motivated reasoning against negative feedback no longer affects their reporting willingness. Thus, a strategy map could help de-bias some of the feedback middle managers pass along to upper management.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)381-404
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Management Control
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2020

Keywords

  • Feedback
  • Middle management
  • Strategy
  • Strategy map

EGS Disciplines

  • Accounting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Strategy Map’s Effect on the Feedback That Middle Managers Pass Along to Upper Management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this