Abstract
This study explains the history of a 1959 amendment to the 1934 Communications Act through the lens of historical institutionalism. The amendment created broad exemptions for newscasts, documentaries, interviews, and news events, triggering the equal time provision for candidates for public office. While this study offers a variety of new empirical details, the chief goal is explanation based on an examination of historical mechanisms—path dependence, critical junctures, agglomeration, asymmetries of power, reinforcement of expectations, and temporal sequencing—that shaped the policy options leading up to the amendment.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 671-686 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Dec 2014 |
EGS Disciplines
- Communication
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Amending Equal Time: Explaining Institutional Change in American Communication Policy: Explaining Institutional Change in American Communication Policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver