An Experimental Comparison of Stand Management Approaches to Sudden Oak Death: Prevention vs. Restoration

Many coastal forests stretching from central California to southwest Oregon are threatened or have been impacted by the invasive forest pathogen Phytophthora ramorum , the cause of sudden oak death. We analyzed a set of stand-level forest treatments aimed at preventing or mitigating disease impacts on stand composition, biomass, and fuels using a before–after-control-intervention experiment with a re-evaluation after 5 years. We compared the effects of restorative management for invaded stands and preventative treatments for uninvaded forests with two stand-level experiments. The restorative treatments contrasted two approaches to mastication, hand-crew thinning, and thinning with pile burning with untreated controls replicated at three distinct sites ( N = 30), while the preventative treatments were limited to hand-crew thinning ( N = 10) conducted at a single site. Half of the restoration treatments had basal sprouts removed 2 and 4 years after treatment. All treatments significantly reduced stand density and increased average tree size without significantly decreasing total basal area, both immediately and 5 years after treatments. Preventative treatments did not reduce the basal area or density of timber species not susceptible to P. ramorum , suggesting the relative dominance of these species increased in accordance with host removal. Follow-up basal sprout removal in the restoration experiment appears to maintain treatment benefits for average tree size and may be associated with small decreases in stand density 5 years after initial treatment. Our study demonstrates that for at least 5 years, a range of common stand management practices can improve forest conditions threatened or impacted by sudden oak death.