TY - JOUR
T1 - An exploration of the relationship between active learning and student motivation in STEM
T2 - a mixed methods study
AU - Stieha, Vicki
AU - Earl, Brittnee
AU - Hagens, Harrisen
AU - Haynes, Meagan
AU - Ulappa, Amy
AU - Bond, Laura
AU - Oxford, Julia Thom
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY 4.0.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Much of the research on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) students’ motivation measures the relationship between student motivation and academic outcomes, focusing on the student’s mindset. Our mixed-methods research takes a different approach and considers the relationship between student motivation and instructional practices. Teaching practices and student motivation were analyzed simultaneously in undergraduate Biology classes using a self-determination theory-based survey to measure students’ motivation during courses that were observed using the Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS), and observation notes were collected to document instructor and student behaviors. Quantitative data were used to differentiate students’ motivational levels, and qualitative data were collected to describe how instructors use specific teaching practices. The results provide a lens into how students’ intrinsic motivation varies alongside the instructional practices and interactions in these classes. We found a correlation between higher levels of student motivation in interactive lectures and student-centered teaching profiles. This study highlights how the same practice can be implemented by multiple instructors with varying student motivation scores, pointing out the importance of fidelity to evidence-based instructional practice methods. The results of this study are discussed in the context of published empirical studies examining evidence-based instructional practices that are conceptually supportive of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Active learning practices observed in this study correlated to positive learning outcomes are discussed and may serve as a guide for instructors interested in implementing specific active learning practices. Recommendations for instructors and departments that are interested in flexible methods to monitor progress toward active learning practices in biology and other STEM disciplines by combining the COPUS and self-determination survey results are presented.
AB - Much of the research on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) students’ motivation measures the relationship between student motivation and academic outcomes, focusing on the student’s mindset. Our mixed-methods research takes a different approach and considers the relationship between student motivation and instructional practices. Teaching practices and student motivation were analyzed simultaneously in undergraduate Biology classes using a self-determination theory-based survey to measure students’ motivation during courses that were observed using the Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS), and observation notes were collected to document instructor and student behaviors. Quantitative data were used to differentiate students’ motivational levels, and qualitative data were collected to describe how instructors use specific teaching practices. The results provide a lens into how students’ intrinsic motivation varies alongside the instructional practices and interactions in these classes. We found a correlation between higher levels of student motivation in interactive lectures and student-centered teaching profiles. This study highlights how the same practice can be implemented by multiple instructors with varying student motivation scores, pointing out the importance of fidelity to evidence-based instructional practice methods. The results of this study are discussed in the context of published empirical studies examining evidence-based instructional practices that are conceptually supportive of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Active learning practices observed in this study correlated to positive learning outcomes are discussed and may serve as a guide for instructors interested in implementing specific active learning practices. Recommendations for instructors and departments that are interested in flexible methods to monitor progress toward active learning practices in biology and other STEM disciplines by combining the COPUS and self-determination survey results are presented.
KW - active learning
KW - evidence-based instructional practices
KW - STEM education
KW - student motivation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85200277140&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1152/ADVAN.00247.2022
DO - 10.1152/ADVAN.00247.2022
M3 - Article
C2 - 38932697
AN - SCOPUS:85200277140
SN - 1043-4046
VL - 48
SP - 621
EP - 638
JO - Advances in Physiology Education
JF - Advances in Physiology Education
IS - 3
ER -