TY - JOUR
T1 - An interdisciplinary assessment of private conservation areas in the Western United States
AU - Quintas-Soriano, Cristina
AU - Gibson, Dainee M.
AU - Brandt, Jodi S.
AU - López-Rodríguez, María D.
AU - Cabello, Javier
AU - Aguilera, Pedro A.
AU - Castro, Antonio J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Conservation easements are the fastest growing private conservation strategy in the United States. However, mechanisms to assess private land conservation as well as their support by the general public are not well understood. This study uses the ecosystem services framework for assessing existing private lands in Idaho and identifies areas for future conservation easements. Using conservation targets of the land trust as a guide for selecting ecosystem services, we (a) mapped the spatial delivery of conservation targets across public and private lands, (b) explored public awareness in terms of social importance and vulnerability, and (c) mapped future priority areas by characterizing conservation bundles. We found that public lands provided the highest levels of conservation targets, and we found no difference in conservation target provision between private areas and conservation easements. The spatial characterization of conservation target bundles identified potential future priority areas for conservation easements, which can guide planning of land trust conservation efforts.
AB - Conservation easements are the fastest growing private conservation strategy in the United States. However, mechanisms to assess private land conservation as well as their support by the general public are not well understood. This study uses the ecosystem services framework for assessing existing private lands in Idaho and identifies areas for future conservation easements. Using conservation targets of the land trust as a guide for selecting ecosystem services, we (a) mapped the spatial delivery of conservation targets across public and private lands, (b) explored public awareness in terms of social importance and vulnerability, and (c) mapped future priority areas by characterizing conservation bundles. We found that public lands provided the highest levels of conservation targets, and we found no difference in conservation target provision between private areas and conservation easements. The spatial characterization of conservation target bundles identified potential future priority areas for conservation easements, which can guide planning of land trust conservation efforts.
KW - Conservation bundles
KW - Ecosystem services
KW - Private lands
KW - Protected areas
KW - Social-ecological systems
KW - Transdisciplinary science
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079751693&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s13280-020-01323-x
DO - 10.1007/s13280-020-01323-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 32086786
AN - SCOPUS:85079751693
SN - 0044-7447
VL - 50
SP - 150
EP - 162
JO - Ambio
JF - Ambio
IS - 1
ER -