TY - JOUR
T1 - Anthropogenic Resistance
T2 - Accounting for Human Behavior in Wildlife Connectivity Planning
AU - Ghoddousi, Arash
AU - Buchholtz, Erin K.
AU - Dietsch, Alia M.
AU - Williamson, Matthew A.
AU - Sharma, Sandeep
AU - Balkenhol, Niko
AU - Kuemmerle, Tobias
AU - Dutta, Trishna
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/1/22
Y1 - 2021/1/22
N2 - Maintaining or restoring connectivity among wildlife populations is a primary strategy to overcome the negative impacts of habitat fragmentation. Yet, current connectivity planning efforts typically assess landscape resistance, the ability of organisms to cross various biophysical elements in a landscape, while overlooking the various ways in which human behaviors influence connectivity. Here, we introduce the concept of “anthropogenic resistance” to capture the impacts of human behaviors on species' movement through a landscape. We discuss psychological and socioeconomic factors that influence the degree of anthropogenic resistance, such as the economic value or the risks posed by a species, and suggest methods to estimate and include anthropogenic resistance in connectivity analyses. Finally, we highlight how addressing anthropogenic resistance through a social-ecological perspective can lead to better outcomes for both humans and wildlife. We call for multidisciplinary approaches in connectivity planning to ensure the functionality of landscapes and sustainability of populations in the long term.
AB - Maintaining or restoring connectivity among wildlife populations is a primary strategy to overcome the negative impacts of habitat fragmentation. Yet, current connectivity planning efforts typically assess landscape resistance, the ability of organisms to cross various biophysical elements in a landscape, while overlooking the various ways in which human behaviors influence connectivity. Here, we introduce the concept of “anthropogenic resistance” to capture the impacts of human behaviors on species' movement through a landscape. We discuss psychological and socioeconomic factors that influence the degree of anthropogenic resistance, such as the economic value or the risks posed by a species, and suggest methods to estimate and include anthropogenic resistance in connectivity analyses. Finally, we highlight how addressing anthropogenic resistance through a social-ecological perspective can lead to better outcomes for both humans and wildlife. We call for multidisciplinary approaches in connectivity planning to ensure the functionality of landscapes and sustainability of populations in the long term.
KW - conservation planning
KW - corridor
KW - ecological traps
KW - human-wildlife coexistence
KW - human-wildlife conflict
KW - landscape of fear
KW - social-ecological systems
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099926619&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/hes_facpubs/78
U2 - 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.12.003
DO - 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.12.003
M3 - Review article
SN - 2590-3330
VL - 4
SP - 39
EP - 48
JO - One Earth
JF - One Earth
IS - 1
ER -