Are Ethics Training Programs Improving? A Meta-Analytic Review of Past and Present Ethics Instruction in the Sciences

Logan L. Watts, Kelsey E. Medeiros, Tyler J. Mulhearn, Logan M. Steele, Shane Connelly, Michael D. Mumford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

151 Scopus citations

Abstract

Given the growing public concern and attention placed on cases of research misconduct, government agencies and research institutions have increased their efforts to develop and improve ethics education programs for scientists. The present study sought to assess the impact of these increased efforts by sampling empirical studies published since the year 2000. Studies published prior to 2000 examined in other meta-analytic work were also included to provide a baseline for assessing gains in ethics training effectiveness over time. In total, this quantitative review consisted of 66 empirical studies, 106 ethics courses, 150 effect sizes, and 10,069 training participants. Overall, the findings indicated that ethics instruction resulted in sizable benefits to participants and has improved considerably within the last decade. A number of specific findings also emerged regarding moderators of instructional effectiveness. Recommendations are discussed for improving the development, delivery, and evaluation of ethics instruction in the sciences.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)351-384
Number of pages34
JournalEthics and Behavior
Volume27
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 4 Jul 2017

Keywords

  • ethics
  • ethics instruction
  • ethics training
  • meta-analysis
  • scientific ethics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are Ethics Training Programs Improving? A Meta-Analytic Review of Past and Present Ethics Instruction in the Sciences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this