Abstract
This paper examines reviewers' reactions to Bill Maher’s documentary film Religulous as a way of beginning a discussion of media and religious hegemony. Hegemony theory posits that dominant ideology typically trumps contesting views, even when the latter do manage to leak through the system. Given this, one might expect that film reviewers serve as a second line of defense for entrenched worldviews. Here, however, a thematic analysis of reviews from major national newspapers reveals that critics provided only slight support to traditional religious views Maher challenges in his filmic plea for agnosticism.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 91-112 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Journal of Media and Religion |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Apr 2011 |
EGS Disciplines
- Communication
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Bombing at the Box Office: Reviewers’ Responses to Agnosticism in Bill Maher’s Religulous: Reviewers' Responses to agnosticism in Bill Maher's religulous'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver