Choice of Methods for Soil Microbial Community Analysis: PLFA Maximizes Power Compared to CLPP and PCR-Based Approaches

Philip W. Ramsey, Matthias C. Rillig, Kevin P. Feris, William E. Holben, James E. Gannon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

138 Scopus citations

Abstract

Polyphasic studies that used phospholipid fatty acid analysis (PLFA) in conjunction with community level physiological profiling (CLPP) or PCR-based molecular methods were analyzed in order to evaluate the power of each strategy to detect treatment effects on soil microbial community structure (MCS). We found no studies where CLPP or PCR-based methods differentiated treatments that were not also differentiated by PLFA. In 14 of 32 studies (44%), PLFA differentiated treatments that were not resolved by CLPP analysis. In 5 of 25 studies (20%), PLFA differentiated treatments that were not resolved by PCR-based methods. We discuss PLFA, CLPP, and PCR-based methods with respect to power to discriminate change in MCS versus potential for characterization of underlying population level changes.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalPedobiologia
Volume50
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2006

Keywords

  • Polyphasic
  • Phospholipid fatty acid
  • PLFA
  • Community level physiological profiling
  • CLPP
  • PCR

EGS Disciplines

  • Biology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Choice of Methods for Soil Microbial Community Analysis: PLFA Maximizes Power Compared to CLPP and PCR-Based Approaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this