Climate suitability as a predictor of conservation translocation failure

Joe Bellis, David Bourke, Joyce Maschinski, Katie Heineman, Sarah Dalrymple

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

The continuing decline and loss of biodiversity has caused an increase in the use of interventionist conservation tools, such as translocation. However, many translocation attempts fail to establish viable populations, with poor release site selection often flagged as an inhibitor of success. We used species distribution models (SDMs) to predict the climate suitability of 102 release sites for amphibians, reptiles, and terrestrial insects and compared suitability predictions between successful and failed attempts. We then quantified the importance of climate suitability relative to 5 other variables frequently considered in the literature as important determinants of translocation success: number of release years, number of individuals released, life stage released, origin of the source population, and position of the release site relative to the species’ range. Probability of translocation success increased as predicted climate suitability increased and this effect was the strongest among the variables we considered, accounting for 48.3% of the variation in translocation outcome. These findings should encourage greater consideration of climate suitability when selecting release sites for conservation translocations and we advocate the use of SDMs as an effective way to do this.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1473-1481
Number of pages9
JournalConservation Biology
Volume34
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2020

Keywords

  • conservation planning
  • ectotermo
  • ectotherm
  • modelo de distribución de especies
  • planeación de la conservación
  • reintroducción
  • reintroduction
  • release site
  • sitio de liberación
  • species distribution model

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Climate suitability as a predictor of conservation translocation failure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this