Abstract
A review of the experimental evidence shows that passivity-based control of saturated induction motors does not provide superior performance over input-ouput linearization. Higher tracking errors can be observed and traced to the open-loop nature of the flux controller. In contrast, input-output linearization controllers achieve close tracking of flux, speed, and position references for the most demanding trajectories.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 820-821 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics |
Volume | 50 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 2003 |