Comparison of the validity of four fall-related psychological measures in a community-based falls risk screening

Delilah S. Moore, Rebecca Ellis, Maria Kosma, Jennifer M. Fabre, Kevin S. McCarter, Robert H. Wood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

We examined the measurement properties of fall-related psychological instruments with a sample of 133 older adults (M age = 74.4 years, SD = 9.4). Measures included the Comprehensive Falls Risk Screening Instrument, Falls-efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC), modified Survey of Activities and Fear of Falling in the Elderly (mSAFFE), Consequences of Falling (CoF), Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE), and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). The FES-I, ABC, mSAFFE, and CoF were significantly correlated with each other, with SF-36, and with mobility. The ABC and mSAFFE were significantly correlated with PASE. The ABC differentiated between fallers and nonfallers and predicted total falls risk. Findings can assist with the selection of psychological instruments in a falls risk screening context.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)545-554
Number of pages10
JournalResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
Volume82
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2011

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Falls prevention
  • Measurement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of the validity of four fall-related psychological measures in a community-based falls risk screening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this