Abstract
In the original article, [1] the authors claimed that pseudocubic lattice-constant values used for the compounds NdMnO3, CsCdCl3, CaVO3, and BaTbO3 in previous work [2] had been replaced in this work with higher-quality measurements; but in fact, they had not been. This error is here corrected, affecting Tables 1-3, Eq. 6, and Fig. 1. These changes improve the mean absolute relative error of the model derived in this work (Eq. 6) from 0.60481% to 0.58317%. As it happens, the accuracy of the models of Jiang et al., [2] Sidey, [3] and Verma and Jindal [4] also improve, from 0.61135%, 0.62240%, and 5.58408% to 0.59190%, 0.60270% and 5.56570%, respectively. On the other hand, the mean absolute relative error in the model of Verma et al. [5] rises from 2.06168% to 2.09131%. With respect to the CaZrO3 prediction in Table 3, Eq. 6 now yields an absolute relative error of 0.96% for the cubic structure but just 0.71% for the orthorhombic one. The corrected tables, Eq. 6, and Fig. 1 are included below.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 113457 |
| Journal | Materials Research Bulletin |
| Volume | 189 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Sep 2025 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Empirical models for predicting cubic/pseudocubic lattice parameters of perovskites” [Materials Research Bulletin, 185(2025), 113318] (Materials Research Bulletin (2025) 185, (S0025540825000261), (10.1016/j.materresbull.2025.113318))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver