Abstract
I examine the effects of issuer credit ratings on the costs associated with seasoned equity offerings (SEOs). The evidence from a panel of SEOs from 1990 to 2014 shows that when firms issue seasoned equity, those with issuer credit ratings pay reduced investment banking fees. I confirm these results by conducting a propensity-score matched-sample comparison analysis of firms that obtain new, long-term issuer credit ratings with an unrated control group. Controlling for known determinants of SEO fees, I find that firms that obtain a new credit rating before issuing seasoned equity pay significantly reduced investment banking fees. In economic terms, underwriting fees for newly rated firms are 7.2% lower than those for similar, yet unrated firms. Finally, I examine the indirect costs of issuance and find evidence that credit-rated firms face reduced market-based costs to issue. Rated firms incur lower dilutionary costs to issue and have more positive abnormal returns surrounding the issue.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 303-330 |
Number of pages | 28 |
Journal | Journal of Financial Research |
Volume | 42 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2019 |
Keywords
- credit ratings
- information asymmetry
- seasoned equity offerings
- value certainty
EGS Disciplines
- Finance and Financial Management