TY - JOUR
T1 - Critical Analysis of Research on the Impact of Visual Literacy for Learning
T2 - Strengths, Weaknesses and Recommendations for Improvement
AU - Guo, Daibao
AU - Zimmer, Wendi
AU - Matthews, Sharon D.
AU - McTigue, Erin M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 International Visual Literacy Association.
PY - 2019/9
Y1 - 2019/9
N2 - The current systematic review aimed to investigate in what ways the incorporation of visual display tasks benefits K-12 students’ content-area learning . After screening 1693 articles at abstract level and a systematic evaluation of methodological quality, we synthesized 44 articles for this review. The qualitative synthesis of the studies is organized by categories of interaction with visual displays (ViDis), instructional support, and types of knowledge and learning. Overall findings indicate the simple inclusion of visual displays does not guarantee a positive learning effect. More detailed findings distinguish three categories of ViDis: author-provided, student-filled-in, and student-created visual displays. Furthermore, we discuss each category’s effectiveness for students’ learning. Additionally, findings on retention and information comprehension are mixed when students are either provided with ViDis or complete ViDis themselves. However, the integration of ViDis in K-12 classrooms indicate highly promising results for enhancing students’ higher-level learning (i.e., analyzing, evaluating, applying, and creating). Finally, we provided practical implications for K-12 teachers and recommendations for future research.
AB - The current systematic review aimed to investigate in what ways the incorporation of visual display tasks benefits K-12 students’ content-area learning . After screening 1693 articles at abstract level and a systematic evaluation of methodological quality, we synthesized 44 articles for this review. The qualitative synthesis of the studies is organized by categories of interaction with visual displays (ViDis), instructional support, and types of knowledge and learning. Overall findings indicate the simple inclusion of visual displays does not guarantee a positive learning effect. More detailed findings distinguish three categories of ViDis: author-provided, student-filled-in, and student-created visual displays. Furthermore, we discuss each category’s effectiveness for students’ learning. Additionally, findings on retention and information comprehension are mixed when students are either provided with ViDis or complete ViDis themselves. However, the integration of ViDis in K-12 classrooms indicate highly promising results for enhancing students’ higher-level learning (i.e., analyzing, evaluating, applying, and creating). Finally, we provided practical implications for K-12 teachers and recommendations for future research.
KW - content-area literacy
KW - graphics
KW - learning
KW - quality of research
KW - systematic literature review
KW - visual literacy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081737619&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/literacy_facpubs/111
U2 - 10.1080/1051144X.2019.1611702
DO - 10.1080/1051144X.2019.1611702
M3 - Article
SN - 1051-144X
VL - 38
SP - 181
EP - 198
JO - Journal of Visual Literacy
JF - Journal of Visual Literacy
IS - 3
ER -