Critical Analysis of Research on the Impact of Visual Literacy for Learning: Strengths, Weaknesses and Recommendations for Improvement

Daibao Guo, Wendi Zimmer, Sharon D. Matthews, Erin M. McTigue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations
9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The current systematic review aimed to investigate in what ways the incorporation of visual display tasks benefits K-12 students’ content-area learning . After screening 1693 articles at abstract level and a systematic evaluation of methodological quality, we synthesized 44 articles for this review. The qualitative synthesis of the studies is organized by categories of interaction with visual displays (ViDis), instructional support, and types of knowledge and learning. Overall findings indicate the simple inclusion of visual displays does not guarantee a positive learning effect. More detailed findings distinguish three categories of ViDis: author-provided, student-filled-in, and student-created visual displays. Furthermore, we discuss each category’s effectiveness for students’ learning. Additionally, findings on retention and information comprehension are mixed when students are either provided with ViDis or complete ViDis themselves. However, the integration of ViDis in K-12 classrooms indicate highly promising results for enhancing students’ higher-level learning (i.e., analyzing, evaluating, applying, and creating). Finally, we provided practical implications for K-12 teachers and recommendations for future research.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)181-198
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Visual Literacy
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2019

Keywords

  • content-area literacy
  • graphics
  • learning
  • quality of research
  • systematic literature review
  • visual literacy

EGS Disciplines

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Critical Analysis of Research on the Impact of Visual Literacy for Learning: Strengths, Weaknesses and Recommendations for Improvement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this