Culture, the formation of ingroups, and policing: A response to Holmes and Smith: A response to: Holmes, Malcolm D., and Brad W. Smith. 2017. Social-Psychological Dynamics of Police-Minority Relations: An Evolutionary Interpretation. Journal of Criminal Justice

William R. King

doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.07.006

Culture, the formation of ingroups, and policing: A response to Holmes and Smith: A response to: Holmes, Malcolm D., and Brad W. Smith. 2017. Social-Psychological Dynamics of Police-Minority Relations: An Evolutionary Interpretation. Journal of Criminal Justice

William R. King

Criminal Justice Department

Sam Houston State University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

I outline a policy-oriented research agenda in response to Holmes and Smith (this issue). This response focuses on the elements of their argument that are most amenable to policy formation at the organizational level. My response also highlights the nexus between ingroup formation, and the formation and alteration of police organizational culture.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	69-70
Number of pages	2
Journal	Journal of Criminal Justice
Volume	59
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.07.006
State	Published - 1 Nov 2018

EGS Disciplines

Forensic Science and Technology

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.07.006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Culture, the formation of ingroups, and policing: A response to Holmes and Smith: A response to: Holmes, Malcolm D., and Brad W. Smith. 2017. Social-Psychological Dynamics of Police-Minority Relations: An Evolutionary Interpretation. Journal of Criminal Justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{6b6914a9d4be4251a02d6a7788163e66,

title = "Culture, the formation of ingroups, and policing: A response to Holmes and Smith: A response to: Holmes, Malcolm D., and Brad W. Smith. 2017. Social-Psychological Dynamics of Police-Minority Relations: An Evolutionary Interpretation. Journal of Criminal Justice",

abstract = "I outline a policy-oriented research agenda in response to Holmes and Smith (this issue). This response focuses on the elements of their argument that are most amenable to policy formation at the organizational level. My response also highlights the nexus between ingroup formation, and the formation and alteration of police organizational culture.",

author = "King, \{William R.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 Elsevier Ltd",

year = "2018",

month = nov,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.07.006",

language = "English",

volume = "59",

pages = "69--70",

}

King, WR 2018, 'Culture, the formation of ingroups, and policing: A response to Holmes and Smith: A response to: Holmes, Malcolm D., and Brad W. Smith. 2017. Social-Psychological Dynamics of Police-Minority Relations: An Evolutionary Interpretation. Journal of Criminal Justice', Journal of Criminal Justice, vol. 59, pp. 69-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.07.006

Culture, the formation of ingroups, and policing: A response to Holmes and Smith: A response to: Holmes, Malcolm D., and Brad W. Smith. 2017. Social-Psychological Dynamics of Police-Minority Relations: An Evolutionary Interpretation. Journal of Criminal Justice. / King, William R.
In: Journal of Criminal Justice, Vol. 59, 01.11.2018, p. 69-70.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Culture, the formation of ingroups, and policing

T2 - A response to Holmes and Smith: A response to: Holmes, Malcolm D., and Brad W. Smith. 2017. Social-Psychological Dynamics of Police-Minority Relations: An Evolutionary Interpretation. Journal of Criminal Justice

AU - King, William R.

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - I outline a policy-oriented research agenda in response to Holmes and Smith (this issue). This response focuses on the elements of their argument that are most amenable to policy formation at the organizational level. My response also highlights the nexus between ingroup formation, and the formation and alteration of police organizational culture.

AB - I outline a policy-oriented research agenda in response to Holmes and Smith (this issue). This response focuses on the elements of their argument that are most amenable to policy formation at the organizational level. My response also highlights the nexus between ingroup formation, and the formation and alteration of police organizational culture.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85024496079

UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.07.006

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.07.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.07.006

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85024496079

SN - 0047-2352

VL - 59

SP - 69

EP - 70

JO - Journal of Criminal Justice

JF - Journal of Criminal Justice

ER -

Culture, the formation of ingroups, and policing: A response to Holmes and Smith: A response to: Holmes, Malcolm D., and Brad W. Smith. 2017. Social-Psychological Dynamics of Police-Minority Relations: An Evolutionary Interpretation. Journal of Criminal Justice

Abstract

EGS Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this