Current state of plant conservation translocations across Europe: motivations, challenges and outcomes

Sandrine Godefroid, Sam Lacquaye, Andreas Ensslin, Sarah Dalrymple, Thomas Abeli, Hannah Branwood, Inmaculada Ferrando Pardo, P. Pablo Ferrer Gallego, Elke Zippel, Luísa Gouveia, Carlos Alberto Lobo, Francisco Fernandes, Marion Rasp, Laura Daco, Maxime Séleck, Philippe Frankard, Leonie K. Fischer, Katerina Koutsovoulou, Aline Finger, Orsolya ValkóGiuseppe Garfi, Branka Španiček, Sarah Bürli, Regula Dickenmann, Johanna Jones, Julien Guyonneau, Guillaume Papuga, Marcello De Vitis, Giuseppe Fenu, Fabienne Van Rossum, Donatella Cogoni, Gail Foster, Margaux Julien, Julien Piqueray, Petr Vít, Véronique Bonnet, Angelino Carta, Patrice Descombes, Maja Lazarević, Norbert Müller, Simone Orsenigo, Sonia Ravera, Mari Sild, Sarah Smyth, Thomas C. Wagner, Tania Walisch, Dalibor Ballian, Vito Emanuele Cambria, Bruno Colas, Lara Dixon, David Draper, Viviane Froidevaux, Konrad Pagitz, Hana Pánková, Tim Pankhurst, Jamie Preston, Patrice Prunier, Sandra Saura-Mas, Karin Sartori, Stephanie A. Socher, Nils Stanik, Anna Wunderli, Tanja Nikowitz, Fiona Jane White

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Plant translocation is a conservation technique increasingly used around the world. In Europe, numerous unpublished initiatives have resulted in scattered information in grey literature that is difficult to access. This represents a major obstacle to the exchange of information and experience among scientists, practitioners and competent authorities. To help filling this gap, we launched a large-scale questionnaire survey with 39 questions relating to methods, motivations, problems encountered and outcomes, supplemented by a screening of scientific publications, grey literature and national/regional databases. We gathered data on 3211 plant translocations across the European continent carried out on 1166 taxa in 28 countries, which represents the largest dataset of its kind in the world to date. Target translocated species were mainly forbs from grassland habitats and had a conservation status of greater concern nationally than globally. Practitioners mainly used plug plants originating from a single source (the geographically closest to the target site). Weather events and plant diseases were the most often unanticipated problems noticed by respondents. Through monitoring, it was found that most populations flowered but often did not reproduce and could not persist for more than five years, showcasing the challenge that translocations still present for conservationists. This work will be useful in linking conservationists and enabling them to save time and resources by more easily identifying the best practices suited to their target species, with the ultimate aim of improving the science and practice of plant translocations in Europe and beyond.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere13849
Pages (from-to)769-792
Number of pages24
JournalBiodiversity and Conservation
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2025

Keywords

  • Assisted colonization
  • Ecological replacement
  • Ecological restoration
  • Plant reintroduction
  • Population reinforcement
  • Species recovery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Current state of plant conservation translocations across Europe: motivations, challenges and outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this