Did They Move On?: An Outcome Evaluation of the Gender-Responsive Program, Girls...Moving On

Linsey A. Belisle; Emily J. Salisbury; Jaclyn Keen

doi:10.1177/15570851211065900

Did They Move On?: An Outcome Evaluation of the Gender-Responsive Program, Girls...Moving On

Linsey A. Belisle, Emily J. Salisbury, Jaclyn Keen

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The current study is an outcome evaluation of the gender-responsive program, Girls...Moving On (GMO). Outcomes for treatment ( n = 135) and control group ( n = 135) participants reflected mixed findings, with no significant reductions in recidivism, which may have been due to problems with implementation. Nevertheless, girls who completed the program had significantly larger reductions in risk scores and increases in strength scores compare to non-completers, but little to no differences in recidivism. Additionally, GMO completers showed improvements in self-efficacy scores. Several implications and considerations regarding the outcomes are discussed to guide future gender-responsive programs for system-impacted girls.

Original language	American English
Journal	Feminist Criminology
Volume	17
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/15570851211065900
State	Published - Apr 2022
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

delinquency
female
girls
juvenile delinquency
juvenile justice
probation

EGS Disciplines

Criminology and Criminal Justice

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1177/15570851211065900License: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{d2174c812dd048e09c95189d5f907bc2,

title = "Did They Move On?: An Outcome Evaluation of the Gender-Responsive Program, Girls...Moving On",

abstract = " The current study is an outcome evaluation of the gender-responsive program, Girls...Moving On (GMO). Outcomes for treatment ( n = 135) and control group ( n = 135) participants reflected mixed findings, with no significant reductions in recidivism, which may have been due to problems with implementation. Nevertheless, girls who completed the program had significantly larger reductions in risk scores and increases in strength scores compare to non-completers, but little to no differences in recidivism. Additionally, GMO completers showed improvements in self-efficacy scores. Several implications and considerations regarding the outcomes are discussed to guide future gender-responsive programs for system-impacted girls. ",

keywords = "delinquency, female, girls, juvenile delinquency, juvenile justice, probation",

author = "Belisle, {Linsey A.} and Salisbury, {Emily J.} and Jaclyn Keen",

year = "2022",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1177/15570851211065900",

language = "American English",

volume = "17",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Did They Move On?: An Outcome Evaluation of the Gender-Responsive Program, Girls...Moving On

AU - Belisle, Linsey A.

AU - Salisbury, Emily J.

AU - Keen, Jaclyn

PY - 2022/4

Y1 - 2022/4

N2 - The current study is an outcome evaluation of the gender-responsive program, Girls...Moving On (GMO). Outcomes for treatment ( n = 135) and control group ( n = 135) participants reflected mixed findings, with no significant reductions in recidivism, which may have been due to problems with implementation. Nevertheless, girls who completed the program had significantly larger reductions in risk scores and increases in strength scores compare to non-completers, but little to no differences in recidivism. Additionally, GMO completers showed improvements in self-efficacy scores. Several implications and considerations regarding the outcomes are discussed to guide future gender-responsive programs for system-impacted girls.

AB - The current study is an outcome evaluation of the gender-responsive program, Girls...Moving On (GMO). Outcomes for treatment ( n = 135) and control group ( n = 135) participants reflected mixed findings, with no significant reductions in recidivism, which may have been due to problems with implementation. Nevertheless, girls who completed the program had significantly larger reductions in risk scores and increases in strength scores compare to non-completers, but little to no differences in recidivism. Additionally, GMO completers showed improvements in self-efficacy scores. Several implications and considerations regarding the outcomes are discussed to guide future gender-responsive programs for system-impacted girls.

KW - delinquency

KW - female

KW - girls

KW - juvenile delinquency

KW - juvenile justice

KW - probation

UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/15570851211065900

U2 - 10.1177/15570851211065900

DO - 10.1177/15570851211065900

M3 - Article

VL - 17

JO - Feminist Criminology

JF - Feminist Criminology

IS - 2

ER -

Did They Move On?: An Outcome Evaluation of the Gender-Responsive Program, Girls...Moving On

Abstract

Keywords

EGS Disciplines

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this