Division, discord, and democracy: A forum on the 2020 U.S. Presidential campaign

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This forum examines the rhetoric of the 2020 U.S. presidential contest, assessing the health of U.S. democracy in the wake of the vicissitudes of the Trump era. The election of Joseph R. Biden, Jr. and the defeat of Donald Trump amidst a global pandemic and following a summer of racial reckoning after the high-profile police killing of George Floyd, among others, created a divisive campaign environment that, as in 2016, included attacks against women, immigrants, and people of color. The essays illustrate the resilience of racist, sexist, and xenophobic rhetoric in political culture—even during a campaign cycle that resulted in progressive change. The authors’ reflections reveal how even when we try to disrupt these rhetorical currents in our politics, they persist: in the dismantling of presidential rhetorical norms; in how we understand democracy; in the selection of vice presidential running mates; and in rhetorical responses to disasters like the COVID-19 pandemic.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)418-422
Number of pages5
JournalQuarterly Journal of Speech
Volume107
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 29 Oct 2021

Keywords

  • 2020 presidential campaign
  • COVID-19 pandemic
  • Donald Trump
  • Joe Biden
  • Kamala Harris

EGS Disciplines

  • Communication
  • American Politics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Division, discord, and democracy: A forum on the 2020 U.S. Presidential campaign'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this