TY - JOUR
T1 - Drug Court Program Monitoring
T2 - Lessons Learned About Program Implementation and Research Methodology
AU - Giacomazzi, Andrew L.
AU - Bell, Valerie
PY - 2007/9
Y1 - 2007/9
N2 - Drug courts were established in the United States as part of an effort to deal with the problems of drug-related criminal offending and the resulting overloading of the courts. Drug courts are purported to offer considerable hope for positive change in offenders, largely because of the balance between intensive supervision and rehabilitative services offered through such programs. This article reviews the implementation of one such drug court in a southern state, discusses noted implementation benchmarks for effective programs from the drug court literature, and examines the findings and lessons learned about program implementation and research methodology from a process evaluation that used multiple methods to assess program implementation.
AB - Drug courts were established in the United States as part of an effort to deal with the problems of drug-related criminal offending and the resulting overloading of the courts. Drug courts are purported to offer considerable hope for positive change in offenders, largely because of the balance between intensive supervision and rehabilitative services offered through such programs. This article reviews the implementation of one such drug court in a southern state, discusses noted implementation benchmarks for effective programs from the drug court literature, and examines the findings and lessons learned about program implementation and research methodology from a process evaluation that used multiple methods to assess program implementation.
KW - Drug court evaluation
KW - Drug court implementation
KW - Process evaluation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547852432&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/crimjust_facpubs/128
U2 - 10.1177/0887403407301494
DO - 10.1177/0887403407301494
M3 - Review article
SN - 0887-4034
VL - 18
SP - 294
EP - 312
JO - Criminal Justice Policy Review
JF - Criminal Justice Policy Review
IS - 3
ER -