x2 Tests for the Choice of the Regularization Parameter in Nonlinear Inverse Problems

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We address discrete nonlinear inverse problems with weighted least squares and Tikhonov regularization. Regularization is a way to add more information to the problem when it is ill-posed or ill-conditioned. However, it is still an open question as to how to weight this information. The discrepancy principle considers the residual norm to determine the regularization weight or parameter, while the χ 2 method [J. Mead, J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl ., 16 (2008), pp. 175–194; J. Mead and R. A. Renaut, Inverse Problems , 25 (2009), 025002; J. Mead, Appl. Math. Comput ., 219 (2013), pp. 5210–5223; R. A. Renaut, I. Hnetynkova, and J. L. Mead, Comput.Statist.Data Anal ., 54 (2010), pp. 3430–3445] uses the regularized residual. Using the regularized residual has the benefit of giving a clear χ 2 test with a fixed noise level when the number of parameters is equal to or greater than the number of data. Previous work with the χ 2 method has been for linear problems, and here we extend it to nonlinear problems. In particular, we determine the appropriate χ 2 tests for Gauss–Newton and Levenberg–Marquardt algorithms, and these tests are used to find a regularization parameter or weights on initial parameter estimate errors. This algorithm is applied to a two-dimensional cross-well tomography problem and a one-dimensional electromagnetic problem from [R. C. Aster, B. Borchers, and C. Thurber, Parameter Estimation and Inverse Problems , Academic Press, New York, 2005].

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)1213-1230
Number of pages18
JournalSIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications
Volume34
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2013

Keywords

  • covariance
  • least squares
  • nonlinear
  • regularization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'x2 Tests for the Choice of the Regularization Parameter in Nonlinear Inverse Problems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this