Erratum to: Tidal decay and stable Roche-lobe overflow of short-period gaseous exoplanets (Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, (2016), 126, 1-3, (227-248), 10.1007/s10569-016-9704-1)

Brian Jackson, Emily Jensen, Sarah Peacock, Phil Arras, Kaloyan Penev

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

In the original paper, there was an error in Fig. 2. For that figure, we calculated the orbital periods corresponding to the surfaces of young stars for comparison to the short orbital periods of some close-in exoplanets. However, we included an extra factor of 4π2 in the unit conversion, overestimating the former periods. Figure 2 included here shows the corrected version. Contrary to the erroneous results in the original paper, none of the short-period planets currently orbits interior to the young stellar surface. In addition, three of the equations contained mistakes. Equation 4 should have read: (Formula presented.) i.e., there is no J term on the right-hand side. Equation 9 should have read (Formula presented.) (Figure presented.) i.e., the rightmost term on the right-hand side was missing. Equation 10 should have rea i.e., (Formula presented.) there should have been a factor of 9/4 in the first term in square brackets and a factor of 1/2 in the second. Fortunately, none of these mistakes affected the model results since the models used the correct relations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)553-554
Number of pages2
JournalCelestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy
Volume129
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum to: Tidal decay and stable Roche-lobe overflow of short-period gaseous exoplanets (Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, (2016), 126, 1-3, (227-248), 10.1007/s10569-016-9704-1)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this