Evaluating Digital Creativity Support for Children: A Systematic Literature Review

Marte Hoff Hagen, Daniela Soares Cruzes, Letizia Jaccheri, Jerry Alan Fails

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Creativity, the process of creating something new and valuable, benefits children by improving their skills and development, encouraging interaction and engagement, and enabling the generation and expression of novel ideas. In recent years, interactive digital tools have emerged to support the user’s creativity in the open-ended creation of new artifacts. However, the question of evaluating the creativity happening in the interplay between children, digital tools, and products is still open. This systematic literature review investigated the evaluations of digital creativity support tools for children and identified 81 peer-reviewed relevant articles from the last 10 years. This research contributes to practitioners and researchers by providing an overview of the evaluations in a framework based on 10 factors (value, novelty, fluency, enjoyment, user feeling, collaboration, expressiveness, immersion, flexibility, and interaction), nine product areas, three approaches, and five methods. The review demonstrated that the evaluations differ widely, and the area lacks a standard evaluation framework. We propose the dimensions of our analysis as an initial framework for situating the evaluation of digital creativity support tools for children that the child–computer interaction community can further refine.

Original languageAmerican English
Article number100603
JournalInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction
Volume38
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2023

Keywords

  • Children
  • Creativity support
  • Digital tool
  • Evaluation
  • Systematic literature review

EGS Disciplines

  • Computer Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating Digital Creativity Support for Children: A Systematic Literature Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this