TY - JOUR
T1 - FE analysis of the effects of simplifications in experimental testing on micromotions of uncemented femoral knee implants
AU - Berahmani, Sanaz
AU - Janssen, Dennis
AU - Wolfson, David
AU - De Waal Malefijt, Maarten
AU - Fitzpatrick, Clare K.
AU - Rullkoetter, Paul J.
AU - Verdonschot, Nico
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2016/5/1
Y1 - 2016/5/1
N2 - Experimental testing of orthopaedic implants requires simplifications concerning load application and activities being analyzed. This computational study investigated how these simplifications affect micromotions at the bone-implant interface of an uncemented femoral knee implant. As a basis, validated in vivo loads of the stance phase of gait and a deep knee bend were adopted. Eventually, three configurations were considered: (i) simulation of the complete loading cycle; (ii) inclusion of only tibiofemoral loads (ignoring patellofemoral loads); and (iii) applying only a single peak tibiofemoral force. For all loading conditions the largest micromotions found at the proximal anterior flange. Without the patellofemoral force, peak micromotions increased 6% and 22% for gait and deep knee bend, respectively. By applying a single peak tibiofemoral force micromotions were overestimated. However, the peak micromotions corresponded to the maximum tibiofemoral force, and strong micromotion correlations were found between a complete loading cycle and a single peak load (R2 = 0.73 and R2 = 0.89 for gait and deep knee bend, respectively). Deep knee bend resulted in larger micromotions than gait. Our study suggests that a simplified peak force can be used to assess the stability of cementless femoral components. For more robust testing, implants should be subjected to different loading modes.
AB - Experimental testing of orthopaedic implants requires simplifications concerning load application and activities being analyzed. This computational study investigated how these simplifications affect micromotions at the bone-implant interface of an uncemented femoral knee implant. As a basis, validated in vivo loads of the stance phase of gait and a deep knee bend were adopted. Eventually, three configurations were considered: (i) simulation of the complete loading cycle; (ii) inclusion of only tibiofemoral loads (ignoring patellofemoral loads); and (iii) applying only a single peak tibiofemoral force. For all loading conditions the largest micromotions found at the proximal anterior flange. Without the patellofemoral force, peak micromotions increased 6% and 22% for gait and deep knee bend, respectively. By applying a single peak tibiofemoral force micromotions were overestimated. However, the peak micromotions corresponded to the maximum tibiofemoral force, and strong micromotion correlations were found between a complete loading cycle and a single peak load (R2 = 0.73 and R2 = 0.89 for gait and deep knee bend, respectively). Deep knee bend resulted in larger micromotions than gait. Our study suggests that a simplified peak force can be used to assess the stability of cementless femoral components. For more robust testing, implants should be subjected to different loading modes.
KW - finite element analysis
KW - micromotions
KW - physiological loading
KW - primary stability
KW - uncemented total knee replacement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84951762683&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jor.23074
DO - 10.1002/jor.23074
M3 - Article
C2 - 26488795
AN - SCOPUS:84951762683
SN - 0736-0266
VL - 34
SP - 812
EP - 819
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Research
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Research
IS - 5
ER -