Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Filling in the gaps: Learning to live with-and teach with-microsoft smartart™

  • Mike Markel

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

    Abstract

    The problem in discussing visual rhetoric is not the erroneous idea that there cannot be a visual rhetoric because only words can communicate meaning. As Goggin (2004) points out, “written verbal rhetoric is visual rhetoric” (p. 88); words are presented in a particular typeface, size, and color, and they function as components of a larger overall visual design of the text in which they appear. Rather, the problem in discussing visual rhetoric is suggested by the title of a 2004 volume edited by Hill and Helmers, Defining Visual Rhetorics. Like the word postmodernism, visual rhetoric is an almost infinitely elastic term, and it is applied, in different ways, by commentators studying painting, photography, advertising, television, film, road signs, architecture, and even crafts such as quilt making.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationDesigning Texts
    Subtitle of host publicationTeaching Visual Communication
    PublisherTaylor and Francis
    Pages283-297
    Number of pages15
    ISBN (Electronic)9781351868143
    ISBN (Print)9780895037855
    StatePublished - 14 Dec 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Filling in the gaps: Learning to live with-and teach with-microsoft smartart™'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this