Financial Statement Complexity and Meeting Analysts' Expectations

Joshua J. Filzen, Kyle Peterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

52 Scopus citations

Abstract

We examine whether firms with greater financial statement complexity are more likely to meet or beat analysts' earnings expectations. We proxy for financial statement complexity using the firm's industry and year adjusted accounting policy disclosure length. Firms with more complex financial statements are more likely to just beat expectations than just miss expectations. Firms with complex financial statements appear to use expectations management to beat expectations, but do not use earnings management. Corroborating these findings, we find analysts rely more on management guidance for more complex firms. Firms with complex financial statements are also more likely to have analysts exclude items from actual "street earnings," but tests suggest this strategy is not specifically used by complex firms to beat expectations. The effect we document is specific to analyst forecasts and not to other alternative benchmarks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1560-1594
Number of pages35
JournalContemporary Accounting Research
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Financial Statement Complexity and Meeting Analysts' Expectations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this