TY - JOUR
T1 - Following in the Footsteps of Policy Entrepreneurs
T2 - Policy Advocates and Pro Forma Adopters
AU - Wampler, Brian
N1 - This is an electronic version of an article published in Journal of Development Studies 45, no. 4: 572-592. Journal of Development Studies is available online at: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp. DOI: 10.1080/00220380802582346
PY - 2009/4
Y1 - 2009/4
N2 - The third wave of democratisation has been accompanied by the spread of new institutions that allow citizens to directly participate in shaping policy outcomes. Leading international organisations, such as the World Bank and UN Habitat, have disseminated 'best practice' programmes identified with 'good government' policy reform efforts. One of the best known programmes, participatory budgeting (PB), was first adopted by an entrepreneurial government in 1989 as a means to promote social justice, accountability, and transparency. Yet, when these programmes are copied by policy advocates and pro forma adopters, the political pay-offs for government officials are smaller, which leads them to provide weaker support for the adopted policy. This article demonstrates that policy entrepreneurs are more likely to provide greater resources and support to innovative policies than their policy advocates and pro forma adopter counterparts due to the types of political payoffs available to them. The article concludes by considering when it might be most appropriate for international funding agencies and nongovernmental organisations to promote best practice policies.
AB - The third wave of democratisation has been accompanied by the spread of new institutions that allow citizens to directly participate in shaping policy outcomes. Leading international organisations, such as the World Bank and UN Habitat, have disseminated 'best practice' programmes identified with 'good government' policy reform efforts. One of the best known programmes, participatory budgeting (PB), was first adopted by an entrepreneurial government in 1989 as a means to promote social justice, accountability, and transparency. Yet, when these programmes are copied by policy advocates and pro forma adopters, the political pay-offs for government officials are smaller, which leads them to provide weaker support for the adopted policy. This article demonstrates that policy entrepreneurs are more likely to provide greater resources and support to innovative policies than their policy advocates and pro forma adopter counterparts due to the types of political payoffs available to them. The article concludes by considering when it might be most appropriate for international funding agencies and nongovernmental organisations to promote best practice policies.
KW - participatory democracy
KW - Brazil
KW - best practices
KW - policy entrepreneurs
UR - https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/polsci_facpubs/7
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650309526&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00220380802582346
DO - 10.1080/00220380802582346
M3 - Article
SN - 0022-0388
VL - 45
SP - 572
EP - 592
JO - Journal of Development Studies
JF - Journal of Development Studies
IS - 4
ER -