TY - GEN
T1 - Fostering Critical Generative AI Use and Systems Thinking Through Project-Based Engineering Education
AU - Hewes, Maxwell
AU - Wada, Katelyn
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 IEEE.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - This work-in-progress report presents a modular, project-based framework for developing generative AI (GAI) literacy and systems thinking in undergraduate thermal-fluids engineering courses. GAI is operationalized through three dimensions of assessment: articulation of intended GAI use context, critical evaluation of output accuracy and limitations, and integration of GAI within problem-solving strategies. Preliminary results from 42 students in a senior level course during the Fall semester of 2025 show clear stratification of GAI literacy: 47.6% demonstrated low, 35.7% moderate, 16.7% high. Qualitative analysis revealed that technical engineering competence did not correlate with GAI literacy. Among students with low literacy, 90% could not identify gaps in GAI outputs and 69% of all students framed GAI as an information source rather than a reasoning partner. These findings informed immediate design iterations for the Spring 2026 semester implementation including computational platform standardization and enhanced system thinking reflection prompts. Future work focuses on checkpoint-based formative assessment, systems thinking rubric development, and the expansion of the project-based resource to introductory thermal-fluid courses.
AB - This work-in-progress report presents a modular, project-based framework for developing generative AI (GAI) literacy and systems thinking in undergraduate thermal-fluids engineering courses. GAI is operationalized through three dimensions of assessment: articulation of intended GAI use context, critical evaluation of output accuracy and limitations, and integration of GAI within problem-solving strategies. Preliminary results from 42 students in a senior level course during the Fall semester of 2025 show clear stratification of GAI literacy: 47.6% demonstrated low, 35.7% moderate, 16.7% high. Qualitative analysis revealed that technical engineering competence did not correlate with GAI literacy. Among students with low literacy, 90% could not identify gaps in GAI outputs and 69% of all students framed GAI as an information source rather than a reasoning partner. These findings informed immediate design iterations for the Spring 2026 semester implementation including computational platform standardization and enhanced system thinking reflection prompts. Future work focuses on checkpoint-based formative assessment, systems thinking rubric development, and the expansion of the project-based resource to introductory thermal-fluid courses.
KW - Engineering education
KW - Generative AI
KW - Open Educational Resources
KW - Systems thinking
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105044082102
U2 - 10.1109/IETC69527.2026.11568618
DO - 10.1109/IETC69527.2026.11568618
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105044082102
T3 - 2026 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing, IETC 2026
BT - 2026 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing, IETC 2026
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2026 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing, IETC 2026
Y2 - 8 May 2026 through 9 May 2026
ER -