TY - JOUR
T1 - Green grabs, land grabs and the spatiality of displacement
T2 - Eviction from Mozambique's Limpopo National Park
AU - Lunstrum, Elizabeth
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers).
PY - 2016/6/1
Y1 - 2016/6/1
N2 - The Mozambican state is currently working to relocate 7000 people from the interior of the Limpopo National Park (LNP), itself part of the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park (GLTP). As the process began in 2003, this stands out as one of the region's most protracted contemporary conservation-related evictions. I draw from this case to shed light on the increasingly complex spatial dynamics of land and green grabs and, more specifically, demonstrate the importance of zooming out from discrete land acquisitions to examine how their resulting displacements are increasingly shaped by spatial processes at and beyond their borders. In doing so, we begin to see that displacement from the LNP is not a simple case of eviction from a discrete protected area. Rather, it has been provoked by the opening of the international border, hence drawing transfrontier conservation areas (TFCAs) like the GLTP into the purview of land and green grabs. At the same time, competition over space with an adjacent grab - a sugarcane/ethanol plantation - has severely interfered with relocation, drastically prolonging it. The case, more broadly, sheds light on how conservation, agricultural extraction and climate change mitigation - all forms of land acquisitions that incite dislocation - come together to produce novel patterns of environmental displacement, placing profound pressures on rural communities and their abilities to occupy space and access resources, including labour opportunities.
AB - The Mozambican state is currently working to relocate 7000 people from the interior of the Limpopo National Park (LNP), itself part of the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park (GLTP). As the process began in 2003, this stands out as one of the region's most protracted contemporary conservation-related evictions. I draw from this case to shed light on the increasingly complex spatial dynamics of land and green grabs and, more specifically, demonstrate the importance of zooming out from discrete land acquisitions to examine how their resulting displacements are increasingly shaped by spatial processes at and beyond their borders. In doing so, we begin to see that displacement from the LNP is not a simple case of eviction from a discrete protected area. Rather, it has been provoked by the opening of the international border, hence drawing transfrontier conservation areas (TFCAs) like the GLTP into the purview of land and green grabs. At the same time, competition over space with an adjacent grab - a sugarcane/ethanol plantation - has severely interfered with relocation, drastically prolonging it. The case, more broadly, sheds light on how conservation, agricultural extraction and climate change mitigation - all forms of land acquisitions that incite dislocation - come together to produce novel patterns of environmental displacement, placing profound pressures on rural communities and their abilities to occupy space and access resources, including labour opportunities.
KW - Climate change mitigation/biofuel
KW - Displacement
KW - Green grabs/land grabs
KW - Neoliberal conservation
KW - Southern Africa
KW - TFCAs
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921469443&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/area.12121
DO - 10.1111/area.12121
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84921469443
SN - 0004-0894
VL - 48
SP - 142
EP - 152
JO - Area
JF - Area
IS - 2
ER -