Guiding the selection of child spellchecker suggestions using audio and visual cues

Brody Downs, Aprajita Shukla, Mikey Krentz, Maria Soledad Pera, Katherine Landau Wright, Casey Kennington, Jerry Fails

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Spellchecking functionality embedded in existing search tools can assist children by offering a list of spelling alternatives when a spelling error is detected. Unfortunately, children tend to generally select the first alternative when presented with a list of options, as opposed to the one that matches their intent. In this paper, we describe a study we conducted with 191 children ages 6-12 in order to offer empirical evidence of: (1) their selection habits when identifying spelling suggestions that match the word they meant to type, and (2) the degree of influence multimodal cues, i.e., synthesized speech and images, have in prompting children to select the correct spelling suggestion. The results from our study reveal that multimodal cues, primarily synthesized speech, have a positive impact on the children's ability to identify their intended word from a list of spelling suggestions.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference, IDC 2020
Pages398-408
Number of pages11
ISBN (Electronic)9781450379816
DOIs
StatePublished - 21 Jun 2020
Event2020 Interaction Design and Children Conference, IDC 2020 - London, United Kingdom
Duration: 21 Jun 202024 Jun 2020

Publication series

NameProceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference, IDC 2020

Conference

Conference2020 Interaction Design and Children Conference, IDC 2020
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityLondon
Period21/06/2024/06/20

Keywords

  • multimedia cues
  • search engine
  • spelling
  • user studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Guiding the selection of child spellchecker suggestions using audio and visual cues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this