History and the relationship between scientific and pedagogical knowledge: anatomy lectures then and now

Wolff Michael Roth, Norm Friesen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

In recent years, school science has been the target of increasing critique for two reasons. On the one hand, it is said to enforce ‘epic’ images of science that celebrate the heroes and heroic deeds that established the scientific canon and its methods and thereby falsifies the history and nature of science. On the other hand, the sciences are presented as objective, making factual statements independent of location and time—a claim that runs counter to the current mainstream canon of scientific knowledge as socially and individually constructed. In this article, we suggest that contexts leading to new scientific knowledge make science objective and subjective simultaneously. Our approach, which focuses on the performative dimensions of (school) science, works to overcome the distinctions between knowledge and knowing and the associated distinction between theory and practice. We show the significance of the performative dimension through a comparison of anatomy lectures and texts from the 17th century and in present-day biology classrooms. We underscore the need to retain and investigate the historical connections between the founding of (scientific) knowledge and its present-day form taught in schools.
Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)180-200
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Curriculum Studies
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 16 May 2013

Keywords

  • objectivity
  • performativity
  • science history
  • subjectivity

EGS Disciplines

  • Education
  • Instructional Media Design

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'History and the relationship between scientific and pedagogical knowledge: anatomy lectures then and now'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this