How Did You Like This Course? The Advantages and Limitations of Reaction Criteria in Ethics Education

Megan R. Turner, Logan L. Watts, Logan M. Steele, Tyler J. Mulhearn, Brett S. Torrence, E. Michelle Todd, Michael D. Mumford, Shane Connelly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ethics courses are most commonly evaluated using reaction measures. However, little is known about the specific types of reaction data being collected (e.g., content relevance, course satisfaction) and how these reaction data relate to improvements in trainee performance (e.g., knowledge, moral reasoning). Using a sample of 381 ethics training sessions, major reaction data categories were identified. Content and course satisfaction were the most frequently collected types of reaction criteria. Furthermore, content relevance (r = .84) and course satisfaction (r = .79) showed strong, positive relationships with performance criteria, whereas content satisfaction demonstrated a moderate, negative relationship (r = –.28). These results and future directions for ethics training evaluation are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)483-496
Number of pages14
JournalEthics and Behavior
Volume28
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 18 Aug 2018

Keywords

  • ethics education
  • ethics training
  • trainee reactions
  • training evaluation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How Did You Like This Course? The Advantages and Limitations of Reaction Criteria in Ethics Education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this