Independent Spending in State Elections After Citizens United by Business, Ideological, and Issue Groups

Michael J. Malbin, Jaclyn Jolene Kettler, Brendan J. Glavin, Keith E. Hamm, Charles R. Hunt

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This paper is the second in a three-part series on independent expenditures (IEs) in state elections since the Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission . We have noted previously that independent expenditures (IEs) in federal elections skyrocketed after Citizens United . In 2008, IEs in U.S. House and Senate elections (other than by formal party committees) amounted to $44 million. In 2016, the total was $647 million – more than fourteen times the level of 2008 (Malbin and Glavin, 2018). In state elections, according to the National Institute on Money in State Poltics (NIMSP), IEs increased by 58% between 2008 and 2012 and 139% between 2006 and 2014 (Burgam, 2016). The growth rate for state-level IEs thus was significant, but not nearly as large as for Congress.
Original languageAmerican English
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 2018 Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association
StatePublished - 2018

EGS Disciplines

  • American Politics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Independent Spending in State Elections After Citizens United by Business, Ideological, and Issue Groups'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this