Abstract
In detection tasks, at long precue-target intervals, inhibition from precueing, rather than facilitation, has been shown. This inhibition, called "inhibition of return" (IOR), does not always occur in discrimination or identification tasks. Here in post-hoc analyses and three new experiments, evidence for IOR was shown in a target identification task using a location-cueing paradigm. In Experiments 1 and 2, a series of three cues attracted attention without eye movement, first to one of four peripheral locations, then to fixation, and then either back to the initial location or to a different one. Identification accuracy for masked visual targets was impaired when third-cue and first-cue locations matched, which constitutes evidence for IOR. In Experiment 3, there was no third cue. An uninformative first cue was followed by a cue at fixation, and then a peripheral target in a "go/no-go" reaction time task. Inhibition of return was still obtained. Thus, IOR can affect identification as well as detection performance, so it could be a general mechanism for optimising search.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 365-388 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Visual Cognition |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 1998 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Inhibition of Return in Visual Identification Tasks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver