Is It Still a Mandate If We Don’t Enforce It?: The Politics of COVID-Related Mask Mandates in Conservative States

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Questions of whether to enforce COVID-related mask mandates are complex. While enforced mandates are more effective at controlling community spread, government imposed behavioral controls have met significant opposition in conservative states, where a political bloc on the right is skeptical that COVID presents a significant and immediate threat. The authors conduct a split sample survey in order to examine how inclusion of a fine provision attached to mask mandates affects support. The survey was conducted in Idaho (a Republican dominated state) at a time when a mask mandate was a central debate. Unsurprisingly, respondents were more supportive of a mask mandate if a fine was not included. Further investigation indicates this is primarily a result of shifting Republican attitudes, which highlights the complex political situation in conservative states as leaders consider best mechanisms for battling COVID.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)106-121
Number of pages16
JournalState and Local Government Review
Volume53
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2021

Keywords

  • COVID
  • mask mandate
  • enforced compliance
  • survey

EGS Disciplines

  • Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is It Still a Mandate If We Don’t Enforce It?: The Politics of COVID-Related Mask Mandates in Conservative States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this