Abstract
Questions of whether to enforce COVID-related mask mandates are complex. While enforced mandates are more effective at controlling community spread, government imposed behavioral controls have met significant opposition in conservative states, where a political bloc on the right is skeptical that COVID presents a significant and immediate threat. The authors conduct a split sample survey in order to examine how inclusion of a fine provision attached to mask mandates affects support. The survey was conducted in Idaho (a Republican dominated state) at a time when a mask mandate was a central debate. Unsurprisingly, respondents were more supportive of a mask mandate if a fine was not included. Further investigation indicates this is primarily a result of shifting Republican attitudes, which highlights the complex political situation in conservative states as leaders consider best mechanisms for battling COVID.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 106-121 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | State and Local Government Review |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2021 |
Keywords
- COVID
- mask mandate
- enforced compliance
- survey
EGS Disciplines
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Is It Still a Mandate If We Don’t Enforce It?: The Politics of COVID-Related Mask Mandates in Conservative States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver