TY - JOUR
T1 - Is Partnership Intensity or Density More Effective?
AU - Fowler, Luke
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2019/9/3
Y1 - 2019/9/3
N2 - Current scholarship identifies benefits to both quality of partnerships and extensiveness of networks when managing shared policy goals. However, with limited collaborative capacity, many public service organizations are faced with a decision of whether to pursue intense connections with specific organizations or dense ties with an array of organizations. From using survey data from 72 local air agencies, findings indicate that intense partnerships are better predictors of improved air quality than dense ties. Conclusions suggest that building strong partnerships is more important than building many partnerships when pursuing shared policy goals in a multidimensional environment.
AB - Current scholarship identifies benefits to both quality of partnerships and extensiveness of networks when managing shared policy goals. However, with limited collaborative capacity, many public service organizations are faced with a decision of whether to pursue intense connections with specific organizations or dense ties with an array of organizations. From using survey data from 72 local air agencies, findings indicate that intense partnerships are better predictors of improved air quality than dense ties. Conclusions suggest that building strong partnerships is more important than building many partnerships when pursuing shared policy goals in a multidimensional environment.
KW - Cross-sectoral collaboration
KW - intergovernmental relations
KW - partnerships
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85060957039
U2 - 10.1080/15309576.2018.1562946
DO - 10.1080/15309576.2018.1562946
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85060957039
SN - 1530-9576
VL - 42
SP - 1186
EP - 1210
JO - Public Performance and Management Review
JF - Public Performance and Management Review
IS - 5
ER -