Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Landscapes—a lens for assessing sustainability

  • Marie C. Dade
  • , Aletta Bonn
  • , Felix Eigenbrod
  • , María R. Felipe-Lucia
  • , Brendan Fisher
  • , Benjamin Goldstein
  • , Robert A. Holland
  • , Kelly A. Hopping
  • , Sandra Lavorel
  • , Yann lede Polain Waroux
  • , Graham K. MacDonald
  • , Lisa Mandle
  • , Jean Paul Metzger
  • , Unai Pascual
  • , Jesse T. Rieb
  • , Améline Vallet
  • , Geoff J. Wells
  • , Carly D. Ziter
  • , Elena M. Bennett
  • , Brian E. Robinson
  • University of Melbourne
  • McGill University
  • Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena
  • German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig
  • University of Southampton
  • CSIC - Pyrenean Institute of Ecology
  • University of Vermont
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Université Grenoble Alpes
  • Stanford University
  • Universidade de São Paulo
  • BC3 Basque Centre for Climate Change
  • Ikerbasque - Basque Foundation for Science
  • University of Bern
  • Université Paris-Saclay
  • Stockholm Resilience Centre
  • Concordia University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Context: There are urgent calls to transition society to more sustainable trajectories, at scales ranging from local to global. Landscape sustainability (LS), or the capacity for landscapes to provide equitable access to ecosystem services essential for human wellbeing for both current and future generations, provides an operational approach to monitor these transitions. However, the complexity of landscapes complicates how and what to consider when assessing LS. Objectives: To identify important features of landscapes that remain challenging to consider in LS assessments and provide guidance to strengthen future assessments. Methods: We conducted two workshops to identify the complex features of landscapes that remain under-considered in LS assessments, and developed guidelines on how to better incorporate these features. Results: We identify open and connected boundaries and diversity of values as landscape features that must be better considered in LS assessments or risk exacerbating offstage sustainability burdens and power inequalities. We provide guidelines to avoid these pitfalls which emphasize assessing ecosystem service interactions across interconnected landscapes and incorporating local actors’ diverse values. Conclusions: Our guidelines provide a stepping stone for researchers and practitioners to better incorporate landscape complexities into LS assessments to inform landscape-level decisions and actions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number28
Pages (from-to)28
JournalLandscape Ecology
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2025

Keywords

  • Landscape Management
  • Nature's Contributions to People
  • Social-Ecological Systems
  • Sustainability
  • Telecoupling
  • Values about Nature

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Landscapes—a lens for assessing sustainability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this