Man bites blue dog: Are moderates really more electable than ideologues?

  • Stephen M. Utych

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Are ideologically moderate candidates more electable than ideologically extreme candidates? Historically, both research in political science and conventional wisdom answer yes to this question. However, given the rise of ideologues on both the right and the left in recent years, it is important to consider whether this assumption is still accurate. I find that, while moderates have historically enjoyed an advantage over ideologically extreme candidates in congressional elections, this gap has disappeared in recent years, where moderates and ideologically extreme candidates are equally likely to be elected. This change persists for both Democratic and Republican candidates.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)392-396
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Politics
Volume82
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Man bites blue dog: Are moderates really more electable than ideologues?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this