Mask Utilization Between Boise and Nampa, ID: Comparison Mask Mandate vs No Mandate

Maria Nieto Ordosgoitia, Jennifer Nguyen, Christin Hoard, Kaitlyn McLeod, Sydney Oleson, Cathy Chen, Sophia Skarvan, Jeremy Knapp, Renae Clark, Caile Spear, Robert Graff

Research output: Contribution to conferencePresentation

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Masks, 6’ distance and handwashing are the primary methods to prevent spread of COVID-19. Idaho had a rising number of COVID-19 cases and no statewide mask mandate to prevent transmission. Boise City Public Health Emergency Order No. 20-13 mask mandate started on 11/23/20 and Nampa had no mandate. Our research question focused on: How does a city mask mandate impact usage?

Observation locations were Boise, ID and Nampa, ID. Locations included 2 similar grocery stores, 2 similar general stores, and one gas station. Every 3rd person exiting the store was counted. Mask use criteria include whether the subject wore a mask, type of mask worn, and if mask was worn correctly. Observation sessions were either 41 persons or 30 minutes long.

Based on 1,975 observations there was a difference between mask use in Boise and Nampa.

Boise City, mask mandate, had a higher percentage (95.67%) of people using masks and (94.23%) used them correctly. And Nampa, with no mask mandate, had lower mask usage (68.44%) and higher incorrect usage (9.09%). Overall, the mask mandate is an effective means of increasing the use of masks and reducing COVID-19 transmission.

Original languageAmerican English
StatePublished - 12 Apr 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mask Utilization Between Boise and Nampa, ID: Comparison Mask Mandate vs No Mandate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this