TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring organization
T2 - Performance in environmental agencies
AU - Fowler, Luke
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2013 by Pracademics Press.
PY - 2013/9/1
Y1 - 2013/9/1
N2 - State environmental agencies have been organized independently with a variety of structural schemes, and are responsible for the bulk of administration of federal environmental policy, such as the Clean Air Act. Using statistical models of air quality outcomes, this research compares three competing typologies for capturing agency differences: Ringquist (1993b), Lester (1990), and Wilson (1989). The findings indicate the most commonly used measure of organization, Ringquist (1993b), may be the weakest in comparison. Additionally, both Lester (1990) and Wilson (1989) show interesting advantages in comparison to each other. The findings provide some interesting insights into the difficult task of measuring organization.
AB - State environmental agencies have been organized independently with a variety of structural schemes, and are responsible for the bulk of administration of federal environmental policy, such as the Clean Air Act. Using statistical models of air quality outcomes, this research compares three competing typologies for capturing agency differences: Ringquist (1993b), Lester (1990), and Wilson (1989). The findings indicate the most commonly used measure of organization, Ringquist (1993b), may be the weakest in comparison. Additionally, both Lester (1990) and Wilson (1989) show interesting advantages in comparison to each other. The findings provide some interesting insights into the difficult task of measuring organization.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84946731175
U2 - 10.1108/IJOTB-16-03-2013-B002
DO - 10.1108/IJOTB-16-03-2013-B002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84946731175
SN - 1093-4537
VL - 16
SP - 326
EP - 358
JO - International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior
JF - International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior
IS - 3
ER -