TY - JOUR
T1 - Midrange Braden Subscale Scores Are Associated with Increased Risk for Pressure Injury Development among Critical Care Patients
AU - Alderden, Jenny
AU - Cummins, Mollie Rebecca
AU - Pepper, Ginette Alyce
AU - Whitney, Joanne D.
AU - Zhang, Yingying
AU - Butcher, Ryan
AU - Thomas, Donna
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by the Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - PURPOSE: The purpose of the current study was to examine the relationship between pressure injury development and the Braden Scale for Pressure Sore Risk subscale scores in a surgical intensive care unit (ICU) population and to ascertain whether the risk represented by the subscale scores is different between older and younger patients. DESIGN: Retrospective review of electronic medical records. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: The sample comprised patients admitted to the ICU at an academic medical center in the Western United States (Utah) and Level 1 trauma center between January 1, 2008 and May 1, 2013. Analysis is based on data from 6377 patients. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was used to determine Braden Scale total and subscale scores, age, and incidence of pressure injury development. We used survival analysis to determine the hazards of developing a pressure injury associated with each subscale of the Braden Scale, with the lowest-risk category as a reference. In addition, we used time-dependent Cox regression with natural cubic splines to model the interaction between age and Braden Scale scores and subscale scores in pressure injury risk. RESULTS: Of the 6377 ICU patients, 214 (4%) developed a pressure injury (stages 2-4, deep tissue injury, or unstageable) and 516 (8%) developed a hospital-acquired pressure injury of any stage. With the exception of the friction and shear subscales, regardless of age, individuals with scores in the intermediate-risk levels had the highest likelihood of developing pressure injury. CONCLUSION: The relationship between age, Braden Scale subscale scores, and pressure injury development varied among subscales. Maximal preventive efforts should be extended to include individuals with intermediate Braden Scale subscale scores, and age should be considered along with the subscale scores as a factor in care planning.
AB - PURPOSE: The purpose of the current study was to examine the relationship between pressure injury development and the Braden Scale for Pressure Sore Risk subscale scores in a surgical intensive care unit (ICU) population and to ascertain whether the risk represented by the subscale scores is different between older and younger patients. DESIGN: Retrospective review of electronic medical records. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: The sample comprised patients admitted to the ICU at an academic medical center in the Western United States (Utah) and Level 1 trauma center between January 1, 2008 and May 1, 2013. Analysis is based on data from 6377 patients. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was used to determine Braden Scale total and subscale scores, age, and incidence of pressure injury development. We used survival analysis to determine the hazards of developing a pressure injury associated with each subscale of the Braden Scale, with the lowest-risk category as a reference. In addition, we used time-dependent Cox regression with natural cubic splines to model the interaction between age and Braden Scale scores and subscale scores in pressure injury risk. RESULTS: Of the 6377 ICU patients, 214 (4%) developed a pressure injury (stages 2-4, deep tissue injury, or unstageable) and 516 (8%) developed a hospital-acquired pressure injury of any stage. With the exception of the friction and shear subscales, regardless of age, individuals with scores in the intermediate-risk levels had the highest likelihood of developing pressure injury. CONCLUSION: The relationship between age, Braden Scale subscale scores, and pressure injury development varied among subscales. Maximal preventive efforts should be extended to include individuals with intermediate Braden Scale subscale scores, and age should be considered along with the subscale scores as a factor in care planning.
KW - Braden Scale
KW - Critical care
KW - Pressure injury
KW - Risk assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021847017&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/WON.0000000000000349
DO - 10.1097/WON.0000000000000349
M3 - Article
C2 - 28671894
AN - SCOPUS:85021847017
SN - 1071-5754
VL - 44
SP - 420
EP - 428
JO - Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing
JF - Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing
IS - 5
ER -