Nanotechnology . . . What Is It Good For? (Absolutely Everything): A Problem Definition Approach

Eric Lindquist, Katrina N. Mosher-Howe, Xinsheng Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Problem definition studies focus on the ways in which problems are characterized in the political domain, and how they can be used strategically to limit or expand policy participation. Nanotechnology entrepreneurs are vying for resources in the political domain while strategically linking their nano-solution to multiple and ambiguous problems. This article considers the evolution of nanotechnology as a solution, and the linked problems from a problem definition perspective. We consider how nanotechnology has been defined over time, in the scientific community and in the media, through development of a database of problem and solution definitional change. We find that, over time, advocates have defined the solution from a more narrow perspective while maintaining the overall ambiguity of the problem set. We suggest that the problem definition perspective is a viable framework for understanding the fluid and complex dynamics of science and technology issues and offer several suggestions for further research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)255-271
Number of pages17
JournalReview of Policy Research
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010

Keywords

  • Agenda setting
  • Nanotechnology
  • Problem definition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nanotechnology . . . What Is It Good For? (Absolutely Everything): A Problem Definition Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this