Abstract
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration instituted a Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution System (PPBES) in 2002. As supplemented by matrix management, PPBES was appealing as an effort to rationalize the performance of an agency with an especially high degree of functional overlap among its component parts. Although PPBES has had some salutary effects, the agency's experience to date consistent with accounts of the difficulties that led to the abandonment of program budgeting by the civilian bureaucracy almost 40 years ago. As such, it speaks to the limits of performance assessment as a means of reallocating resources and responsibilities across organizational boundaries.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 435-447 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Public Administration Review |
| Volume | 69 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2009 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'NOAA's resurrection of program budgeting: Déjà Vu all over again?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver