Partisanship and Support for Devolving Concrete Policy Decisions to the States

David Doherty, Michael Touchton, Jeffrey Lyons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Do people think that some policies should be handled by the states, rather than the national government? In an era characterized by stark party polarization there is reason to suspect that attitudes regarding federalism are shaped by partisan considerations. Specifically, reported support for devolution may be driven by exposure to elite partisan cues and partisan reasoning tied to which political party devolution would empower. Using data from the 2022 Cooperative Election Study, we find that partisans tend to differ—often substantially—in their support for state-level decision-making regarding concrete policy proposals. However, these differences are largely driven by those who are most likely to be exposed to elite cues. We also find that, among both Democrats and Republicans, support for policy devolution is contingent on which party controls the state legislature in an individual’s state. The findings suggest that partisanship plays a central role in shaping what the public says when asked about which level of government should determine whether to implement specific policy proposals.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPolitical Behavior
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2024

Keywords

  • Devolution
  • Federalism
  • Motivated reasoning
  • Partisanship
  • Public opinion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Partisanship and Support for Devolving Concrete Policy Decisions to the States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this