Partnering to Improve Engineering Learning and Performance

Donald Plumlee, Steven W. Villachica, Linda Huglin, Shannon Rist

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

Our effort addresses the question: How can successes in engineering education research translate into widespread instructional practice? Published research has provided a robust set of documented tools and techniques for transforming individual engineering courses from traditional lecture-based formats to those that emphasize project- and problem-based learning[1]. These new formats support transfer of learned skills to subsequent courses and the workplace. Unfortunately, the mere availability of such research has not resulted in its widespread adoption across engineering programs. The pace of adoption has been slow and sporadic, which has led researchers to identify a "Valley of Death" separating research and practice [2]. Attempts to encourage widespread adoption of research-based engineering education practices by "pushing" effective techniques on faculty via workshops have not produced consistent results. Nor has the redesign of single courses that produce "one-offs" that never lead to wider adoption of such instructional approaches across the curriculum.
Original languageAmerican English
Title of host publication119th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
StatePublished - 11 Jun 2012

Publication series

Name119th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition

EGS Disciplines

  • Materials Science and Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Partnering to Improve Engineering Learning and Performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this