TY - JOUR
T1 - Raman spectroscopy for mineral identification and quantification for in situ planetary surface analysis
T2 - A point count method
AU - Haskin, Larry A.
AU - Wang, Alian
AU - Rockow, Kaylynn M.
AU - Jolliff, Bradley L.
AU - Korotev, Randy L.
AU - Viskupic, Karen M.
PY - 1997
Y1 - 1997
N2 - Quantification of mineral proportions in rocks and soils by Raman spectroscopy on a planetary surface is best done by taking many narrow-beam spectra from different locations on the rock or soil, with each spectrum yielding peaks from only one or two minerals. The proportion of each mineral in the rock or soil can then be determined from the fraction of the spectra that contain its peaks, in analogy with the standard petrographic technique of point counting. The method can also be used for nondestructive laboratory characterization of rock samples. Although Raman peaks for different minerals seldom overlap each other, it is impractical to obtain proportions of constituent minerals by Raman spectroscopy through analysis of peak intensities in a spectrum obtained by broad-beam sensing of a representative area of the target material. That is because the Raman signal strength produced by a mineral in a rock or soil is not related in a simple way through the Raman scattering cross section of that mineral to its proportion in the rock, and the signal-to-noise ratio of a Raman spectrum is poor when a sample is stimulated by a low-power laser beam of broad diameter. Results obtained by the Raman point-count method are demonstrated for a lunar thin section (14161,7062) and a rock fragment (15273,7039). Major minerals (plagioclase and pyroxene), minor minerals (cristobalite and K-feldspar), and accessory minerals (whitlockite, apatite, and baddeleyite) were easily identified. Identification of the rock types, KREEP basalt or melt rock, from the 100-location spectra was straightforward.
AB - Quantification of mineral proportions in rocks and soils by Raman spectroscopy on a planetary surface is best done by taking many narrow-beam spectra from different locations on the rock or soil, with each spectrum yielding peaks from only one or two minerals. The proportion of each mineral in the rock or soil can then be determined from the fraction of the spectra that contain its peaks, in analogy with the standard petrographic technique of point counting. The method can also be used for nondestructive laboratory characterization of rock samples. Although Raman peaks for different minerals seldom overlap each other, it is impractical to obtain proportions of constituent minerals by Raman spectroscopy through analysis of peak intensities in a spectrum obtained by broad-beam sensing of a representative area of the target material. That is because the Raman signal strength produced by a mineral in a rock or soil is not related in a simple way through the Raman scattering cross section of that mineral to its proportion in the rock, and the signal-to-noise ratio of a Raman spectrum is poor when a sample is stimulated by a low-power laser beam of broad diameter. Results obtained by the Raman point-count method are demonstrated for a lunar thin section (14161,7062) and a rock fragment (15273,7039). Major minerals (plagioclase and pyroxene), minor minerals (cristobalite and K-feldspar), and accessory minerals (whitlockite, apatite, and baddeleyite) were easily identified. Identification of the rock types, KREEP basalt or melt rock, from the 100-location spectra was straightforward.
KW - Alkyl radical loss
KW - Collision activation
KW - Competition experiment
KW - Consecutive reactions
KW - Distonic ions
KW - Elimination
KW - Hetero cumulenes
KW - Hydrogen shift
KW - Metastable
KW - Neutralization-reionization
KW - γ-cleavage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031414268&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/97JE01694
DO - 10.1029/97JE01694
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0031414268
SN - 0148-0227
VL - 102
SP - 19293
EP - 19306
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
IS - E8
M1 - 97JE01694
ER -